- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 12:01:38 +0200
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Toby Inkster, Mon, 3 May 2010 08:52:00 +0100: > In HTML 4, <object> is allowed as a child of <head>. Not so in the > current HTML5 draft. Welcome! ;-) > I can't seem to find any mention of this change in the draft spec, nor > in the html5-diff draft. I've searched for '"object element" html5 > head' on Google to try to find the reasoning for it, but nothing's come > up. > > Can I ask why the change? Suspicion: In the DOM, then <object> doesn't *stay* in the <head>. (Except in IE, that is.) > If this is an oversight, and we do want to > continue to allow <object> in <head>, then can the draft spec be > updated; Use case? > otherwise can the html5-diff draft be updated? A HTML5-HTML4 comparison which was as short, dry, accurate and complete as possible would be great. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 10:02:12 UTC