- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:39:09 +0000
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>, W3C HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <55687cf81002170339j63cf1eddk3924d4ac2e4e43a2@mail.gmail.com>
Hi ian, >and the off-page link features of ARIA, ther are no 'off-page link features' currently specified in ARIA. >as well as an API for handling focus and magnification for ATs It makes focus movement an 'option' for screen magnifiers, thus introducing a different focus behaviour than for other elements (still an open bug http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8722). btw this is not an objection. regards stevef On 17 February 2010 11:20, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Martin Kliehm wrote: > > > > Ian is right that the initial accessibility of the <object> and <img> > > elements was worse > > I'm not talking about the _initial_ accessibility, I'm talking about the > state of the art of <object> and <img>, vs the state of the art of > <canvas>. The <object> and <img> elements have a worse accessibility story > (essentially just fallback for <object>, and only text fallback with an > off-page link for <img>) than <canvas> (which has the same full-DOM > fallback as <object> and the off-page link features of ARIA, as well as an > API for handling focus and magnification for ATs). > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 11:40:06 UTC