- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:20:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Martin Kliehm <martin.kliehm@namics.com>
- Cc: W3C HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Martin Kliehm wrote: > > Ian is right that the initial accessibility of the <object> and <img> > elements was worse I'm not talking about the _initial_ accessibility, I'm talking about the state of the art of <object> and <img>, vs the state of the art of <canvas>. The <object> and <img> elements have a worse accessibility story (essentially just fallback for <object>, and only text fallback with an off-page link for <img>) than <canvas> (which has the same full-DOM fallback as <object> and the off-page link features of ARIA, as well as an API for handling focus and magnification for ATs). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 11:21:21 UTC