- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 08:38:23 -0800
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> ... >>> But anyway, the Team will do what they do. If you want there to be >>> issue markers in the input we give to the Team before they do >>> their final edits, I suggest you report the issues to the Working >>> Group first. >>> ... >> I did do that. Over here. >> What now? Should I open a Bugzilla issue? > > Yes. > >> What component? It affects both RDFa and Microdata, after all. > > New components will be create by the time documents are published as > separate drafts, if not before. > > Feel free to create a bug on each. > > At the current time, HTMl5 spec bugs is a suitable component for > bugs against Microdata. In addition to what Sam said, I would suggest that, for maximum effectiveness, any bugs filed should contain the information recommended here: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#bugzilla-bug * A clear statement of a problem with the spec—bug reports are more useful if they identify concrete problems. * Only one issue—please use separate bugs for separate issues. * An indication of what section or sections of the spec are affected. * At least one suggested way to solve the problem. Optionally, this can include sample spec text. Listing multiple alternatives is ok, and even a vague suggestion is fine at this stage. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 16:38:57 UTC