Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs

On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> ...
>>> But anyway, the Team will do what they do. If you want there to be  
>>> issue markers in the input we give to the Team before they do  
>>> their final edits, I suggest you report the issues to the Working  
>>> Group first.
>>> ...
>> I did do that. Over here.
>> What now? Should I open a Bugzilla issue?
> Yes.
>> What component? It affects both RDFa and Microdata, after all.
> New components will be create by the time documents are published as  
> separate drafts, if not before.
> Feel free to create a bug on each.
> At the current time, HTMl5 spec bugs is a suitable component for  
> bugs against Microdata.

In addition to what Sam said, I would suggest that, for maximum  
effectiveness, any bugs filed should contain the information  
recommended here:

	* A clear statement of a problem with the spec—bug reports are more  
useful if they identify concrete problems.
	* Only one issue—please use separate bugs for separate issues.
	* An indication of what section or sections of the spec are affected.
	* At least one suggested way to solve the problem. Optionally, this  
can include sample spec text. Listing multiple alternatives is ok, and  
even a vague suggestion is fine at this stage.


Received on Sunday, 14 February 2010 16:38:57 UTC