- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:19:53 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:45:37 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> I already have objected to re-publish these sections as part of the >> Microdata spec, see >> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0042.html>. >> In particular, I'd like to see a statement from the editor about >> whether this is intentional, or just an oversight (potentially caused >> by the way the specs are generated). > > I'm not the editor, but I know this is intentional. This changes is not merely editorial. We've asked that commit messages for non-editorial changes include rationale. Can anybody out there help me identify the commit which introduced this change? http://twitter.com/WHATWG http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/commit-watchers-whatwg.org/2010/thread.html - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 17:20:27 UTC