Re: CfC: Publish HTML5, RDFa heartbeats and Microdata, 2D Context and H:TML as FPWDs

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:45:37 +0100, Julian Reschke 
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> I already have objected to re-publish these sections as part of the 
>> Microdata spec, see 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0042.html>. 
>> In particular, I'd like to see a statement from the editor about 
>> whether this is intentional, or just an oversight (potentially caused 
>> by the way the specs are generated).
> 
> I'm not the editor, but I know this is intentional.

Thanks for the feedback.

So does anybody want to argue that development of metadata vocabularies 
is part of our charter?

I have no problem with people working on this, but this *really* should 
  be coordinated with other stakeholders, such as:

- RDF community (there's no reason why vocabularies can't be shared 
between RDF and Microdata, as far as I understand),

- Microformats, and

- the relevant IETF Working Groups, which just obsoleted RFC 2445 (with 
RFC 5545), and are working ob obsoleting RFC 2426 (with 
draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-09).

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 17:08:23 UTC