W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2010

Re: New round of Working Drafts (was Re: New split-out drafts)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:26:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4B694F47.2050302@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
>> 3. References
>>> [HTML5] 
>>> HTML5, I. Hickson. WHATWG, August 2009.
>> The HTML5 reference in this document points to the WHAT WG version of 
>> HTML5.  This reference should be changed in the W3C FPWD to point to the 
>> W3C version of HTML5.
> Why?
> ...

For once, it points to a spec called "HTML5 (including next generation 
additions still in development)" which includes Microdata. That doesn't 
make any sense at all.

But I guess Paul's point was that a W3C spec that extended HTML5 
preferably should normatively reference the W3C version (with which I 

A bigger issue is that the draft (at least the Feb 03 version at 
<http://dev.w3.org/html5/md/>) re-introduces the predefined vocabularies 
that were removed from HTML5 earlier on; I believe that is either an 
oversight, or an attempt to undo an earlier change. Whatever the reason 
is, I object to the publication of this with this addition.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 10:26:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:58 UTC