Re: ISSUES 90, 91, 93, 96, 97 -- if you support these change proposals

Hi Tab,

>> However, the main point is that the accessibility task force has
>> declared that they will make these elements better [4].  I don't see
>> any issues or actions is in the Accessibility Task Force's own tracker
>> [5] to insure that <figure>, <aside>, <hidden>, <progress>, and
>> <meter> are all made better.
>
> Luckily, all of these elements are very simple and straightforward

Then it shouldn't be a problem for the accessibility task force to
follow through on their promise of insuring that they are accessible.
Proposed action plan:

1. Put each element into the accessibility task force tracker with
corresponding actions to examine each one individually for
accessibility.
2. Require a sign off resolution from the task force to the working
group stating that each element is indeed accessible.

I just don't want this to fall between the cracks.

> That would be the "interim" period.

What are the specific dates of the "interim" period?

>From April 30, 2010 to _?

Please fill in the blank.

Best Regards,
Laura
-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 15:58:25 UTC