- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:13:34 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:35 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > > This is informed by discussion with lots of people, but nobody else > > > has looked at it, so it's just from me. > > > > Would the following be an acceptable compromise? > > > > <p>What some specifications, in particular the HTTP and URI > > specifications, refer to as a <i>representation</i> is referred to in > > this specification as a <dfn title="">resource</dfn>.</p> > > As a point of clarification, would you include the RFC references for > the HTTP and URI specs after that sentence, as alluded to below? > > > > of [RFC3986]. > > > > The spec's style is to not use references in sentences but to use the > > colloquial names of the specifications and then have the reference > > after the sentence. I hadn't thought about it, but sure, if people think that would be helpful. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 08:14:11 UTC