- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:42:42 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:35 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: >> This is informed by discussion with lots of people, but nobody >> else has looked at it, so it's just from me. > > Would the following be an acceptable compromise? > > <p>What some specifications, in particular the HTTP and URI > specifications, refer to as a <i>representation</i> is referred to > in this specification as a <dfn title="">resource</dfn>.</p> As a point of clarification, would you include the RFC references for the HTTP and URI specs after that sentence, as alluded to below? >> of [RFC3986]. > > The spec's style is to not use references in sentences but to use the > colloquial names of the specifications and then have the reference > after the sentence. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 07:43:20 UTC