Re: ISSUE-30 (Longdesc) Change Proposal

Joshue O Connor On 09-10-30 17.06:

> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Joshue O Connor:
>>> Jonas Sicking wrote:


>> However I don't see a cowpath for @longdesc given how little it's been used.
> It would be a good idea for us to look at why this was the case, and
> learn from it.

Is there any reason to think that @longdesc has failed for other 
reasons than other things that have failed in HTML?


I could mention: lack of a test suite. And I could mention lack of 
popular non-AT implementations. That latter issue makes Jonas' 
argumentation in parts circular.
leif halvard silli

Received on Friday, 30 October 2009 16:23:52 UTC