Re: Proposal to publish HTML5 and vocab specs

Sam Ruby wrote:
> ...
> Let's be clear.  What Julian was stating was that we had affirmed RDFa 
> in HTML.  I simply stated that the level of affirmation (i.e., Working 
> Draft) was precisely the same for RDFa in HTML as it was for Microdata. 
>  It still is possible that neither of them will make it to CR.  Or both 
> of them.  Or just one.
> ...

I still disagree on that. Microdata was put into the spec based on a 
unilaterally decision of the editor. The WG failed to get it removed 
before publishing a WD, true, but that's not quite the same thing as 
having made a conscious decision to include it.

> ...

BR, Julian