Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > Let's be clear. What Julian was stating was that we had affirmed RDFa > in HTML. I simply stated that the level of affirmation (i.e., Working > Draft) was precisely the same for RDFa in HTML as it was for Microdata. > It still is possible that neither of them will make it to CR. Or both > of them. Or just one. > ... I still disagree on that. Microdata was put into the spec based on a unilaterally decision of the editor. The WG failed to get it removed before publishing a WD, true, but that's not quite the same thing as having made a conscious decision to include it. > ... BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 07:27:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:01 UTC