- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:26:38 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > Let's be clear. What Julian was stating was that we had affirmed RDFa > in HTML. I simply stated that the level of affirmation (i.e., Working > Draft) was precisely the same for RDFa in HTML as it was for Microdata. > It still is possible that neither of them will make it to CR. Or both > of them. Or just one. > ... I still disagree on that. Microdata was put into the spec based on a unilaterally decision of the editor. The WG failed to get it removed before publishing a WD, true, but that's not quite the same thing as having made a conscious decision to include it. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 07:27:23 UTC