- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:53:38 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, John Giannandrea <jg@metaweb.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin McEvoy wrote: > > You mentioned in an earlier email that @itemid is similar to @about in > RDFa, @about in RDFa also supports relative urls do you think @itemid > should too, I feel it would be useful in situations as I described in my > first email[1] where @id and @itemid identify the same thing. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0896.html On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Martin McEvoy wrote: > > An after thought I have on why @itemid should allow relative urls is for > the benefit of reducing fragility under copy and paste if the following > example does get copied and reproduced somewhere else on the web, it may > not seem *obvious* to an unsuspecting author to change the value of > itemid. > > <div id="a" > itemid="http://organization.com/#a" > itemscope > itemtype="http://microformats.org/profile/hcard"> > <a itemprop="url fn org" href="http://organization.com/"> > Example Oranization > </a> > </div> > > @itemid is not visible data is is? imagine an author changing that > snippet of code in a wysiwyg editor such as Dreamweaver, fragile it > would seem. Allowing relative urls also would reduce/remove this risk. Yeah, fair enough. Done. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 20:21:38 UTC