- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:21:49 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:03:19 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > Further research > > We could rerun the same data collection but this time with "scripting > enabled" so that we can get data for <noscript>, and also include > <script> so we could get more accurate results than the regexp searches, > in order to find out whether the double escape algorithm can be tweaked > somehow for better compat or less complexity. <Philip`> zcorpan_: http://philip.html5.org/data/cdata-containing-self-close-with-script.txt <zcorpan_> Philip`: thanks! <zcorpan_> http://simon.html5.org/dump/cdata-containing-self-close-with-script.xml <zcorpan_> 884 occurrences for script <zcorpan_> 5 for noscript <zcorpan_> two of the noscript have the encoding problem <zcorpan_> one would show "-->" <zcorpan_> one works equally with or without escapedness <zcorpan_> and one has the <noscript><!--</noscript>FOO<noscript>--></noscript> "trick" <zcorpan_> which will actually start to work as a trick with the currently specified parsing rules http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20091026#l-282 I think we're fine with not supporting escapedness for noscript. I'll have a look at the script occurrences and see if I can come to any conclusion. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 11:22:34 UTC