- From: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:18:39 +0100
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Paul Cotton wrote: >> * Even if the LC->WD->LC thing didn't happen, the W3C Process seems >> to allow for the first HTML5 LC to say the canvas feature is "at >> risk" and then it could be removed (and added to a separate spec) >> before moving to PR. That would give time to develop accessibility >> solutions, before deciding if/how to best split canvas out of the >> HTML5 spec. > > The W3C Process step that permits a WG to declare features as being > "at risk" is the Call for Implementation (aka Candidate > Recommendation) stage. See: > http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfi Oops, I need to read these things more carefully - thanks for the correction! -- Philip Taylor pjt47@cam.ac.uk
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 13:19:14 UTC