- From: Joe D Williams <joedwil@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:20:25 -0700
- To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com>
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Tony Ross" <tross@microsoft.com>, <public-html@w3.org>
> > More irritatingly, the SVGweb solution is invalid in so many other > ways: For the <object> variant, the IE version uses the invalid > src="" attribute instead of data="". And no attempt is made on using > OBJECT fallback - instead one uses conditional comments. > in particular, > the IE version uses the invalid src="" attribute instead of data="". The use of src='resourcefilename' would not be invalid if the host browser has negotiated with the plugin to handle it this way. In <object> the standard attribute @data has some special features but is not related that I can see to the "data-" discussion. Thanks and Best Regards, Joe
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 01:21:16 UTC