- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:34 +0200
- To: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Tony Ross" <tross@microsoft.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:45:25 +0200, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com> wrote: > The use of class names is moot, because they don't provide a process > whereby we can ensure that there are no name clashes with class names. > There is nothing decentralized, or distributed when it comes to the > use of class names. I think we're heading off on a tangent in this > discussion. Class names can be a URI (and are therefore unique enough as far as I can tell) and for the case of widgets implemented in JavaScript it does not seem that much more complexity is needed really. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 11:51:11 UTC