Re: typeof document.all

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Brendan Eich wrote:
> But isn't it easy for you to suggest even more host object loopholes, 
> when Ecma TC39 is trying to constrain or close the existing ones? It's 
> not that simple, and again: the world should not optimize for Hixie's 
> convenience, or any one implementor's.

I'm happy to spec whatever makes sense here -- I have no strong opinion 
one way or the other on what should happen with document.all. I just want 
it to be well-defined.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 04:47:51 UTC