- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:03:06 +0300
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Oct 14, 2009, at 19:49, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > wrote: >>> >>> Would it be OK to undefine the insertion point (i.e. make >>> document.write() >>> blow away the page if called) in all these cases including nested >>> event >>> loops created by these? >> >> In face, I would say it's preferable :) > > That should say "In fact...". Sorry about spam. OK. I implemented this and filed a spec bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7926 -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2009 09:03:45 UTC