- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:12:53 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> ... >> Because IMHO they are an integral part of the HTML language. XHR for >> example is almost entirely language independent. There's certainly >> features that I'd like to see broken out of HTML5, such as the Window >> object, but given that microdata introduces new markup, I think >> breaking that out would be much more awkward. Another couple of > > The same can be said about RDFa. Indeed. > Unless the WG is prepared to decide on RDFa *or* Microdata, both extensions > should get the same treatment. I definitely prefer microdata over RDFa. I.e. I think microdata solves the use cases better than RDFa does, due to microdata being simpler. That's what I intended to say in my initial email in this thread. However I respect if that the WG might feel otherwise. Just giving my opinion. And I don't in any way prevent publishing of the RDFa+HTML spec. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 14 October 2009 20:19:52 UTC