- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:04:53 -0400
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Incorrect. Many URIs can identify the same XXXX. Then I'm not understanding here. In what sense are those XXXXs then "the same", if their URLs differ? > If that is a good thing, why aren't we changing stuff like: > >> A DOCTYPE must consist of the following characters, in this order: >> >> 1. A U+003C LESS-THAN SIGN (<) character. >> 2. A U+0021 EXCLAMATION MARK (!) character. >> 3. A string that is an ASCII case-insensitive match for the string >> "DOCTYPE". >> 4. One or more space characters. >> 5. A string that is an ASCII case-insensitive match for the string >> "HTML". >> 6. Optionally, a DOCTYPE legacy string (defined below). >> 7. Zero or more space characters. >> 8. A U+003E GREATER-THAN SIGN (>) character. > > ??? I don't know. That could certainly be made a lot more concise without sacrificing precision.
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 15:05:28 UTC