- From: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:27:45 -0500
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>, URI <uri@w3.org>, uri-review@ietf.org
The suggested text sounds fine, but I'm not sure I understand the expected behavior of reserved but unresolvable "about" URIs. On Sep 18, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > The revised text I've suggested for section 5 is as follows: [...] > 5.1 Reserved "about" URIs [...] > Other specifications MAY reserve additional "about" URIs. > Applications attempting to resolve reserved "about" URIs that are > not defined to be resolvable, MAY treat such URIs as being > unreserved. Doesn't this defeat the purpose of reserving an unresolvable about URI? If applications can treat unresolvable "about" URIs (such as about:legacy-compat) as unreserved, what exactly is being reserved for them? -- Joseph Holsten http://josephholsten.com mailto:joseph@josephholsten.com tel:+1-918-948-6747
Received on Monday, 5 October 2009 15:28:23 UTC