- From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:50:26 -0500
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
2009/11/16 Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>: > Moreover something what is appropriate for web -- non-draconian error > handling and error recovery -- is not necessary appropriate for other > domains -- if you use XML for business data interchange draconian error > handling makes much more sense. Parsers could be permitted to use draconian error handling at user request. Then groups that don't want it don't have to have it, while groups that want it can have it. The current situation gives us no standardized XML-like data format without draconian error-handling. This is a problem unless HTML is really the only use-case for non-draconian error-handling, which I think is very unlikely. For instance, I've been told some widely-used RSS readers have seen fit to implement error recovery -- which must currently be completely non-interoperable because of the lack of standardization here.
Received on Monday, 16 November 2009 18:50:54 UTC