W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2009

Re: the MathML comments

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:24:56 -0800
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Message-id: <CB8F1A83-95D0-4A0F-9925-D9DB327FC135@apple.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>

On Nov 8, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:20:30 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak  
> <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> 3) It's also possible to have a call for consensus on cross-WG  
>> comments. But I agree with Sam that it's more considerate to send  
>> collected comments from individuals, because then the receiving WG  
>> knows who to talk to if they disagree. Indeed, I'd suggest that  
>> future cross-WG comments should name the individuals who provided  
>> them.
>
> Maybe the individuals can send their feedback to the relevant WG  
> directly (unless the relevant WG explicitly prefer one batch email  
> with feedback)?
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u20tqopiidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local

We could do that, but I suspect that if we did not have an organized  
effort of some kind, we would likely deliver significantly less  
feedback.

  - Maciej
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 06:25:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:03 UTC