W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2009

Re: the MathML comments

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:02:35 +0100
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <op.u232yli6idj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:20:30 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:

> 3) It's also possible to have a call for consensus on cross-WG comments.  
> But I agree with Sam that it's more considerate to send collected  
> comments from individuals, because then the receiving WG knows who to  
> talk to if they disagree. Indeed, I'd suggest that future cross-WG  
> comments should name the individuals who provided them.

Maybe the individuals can send their feedback to the relevant WG directly  
(unless the relevant WG explicitly prefer one batch email with feedback)?

http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u20tqopiidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 9 November 2009 05:03:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:03 UTC