- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:41:43 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
I would say this is the proper venue to state that before asking for volunteers to review other specifications for the group, the group formalize a procedure. One that can also adapt to immediate deadlines, and disinterested WG members. Shelley On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Shelley, > > I do appreciate that you collected the comments and passed along the > feedback. That was excellent work. In the course of the discussion, it > seemed the MathML WG expected that HTML WG members would understand and > stand behind the comments. At this point I clarified that, while you indeed > duly volunteered to provide cross-WG feedback, these comments had not been > fully reviewed or assessed for WG consensus. Thus, other WG members might > not be able to stand behind or explain the comments (or might not even be > aware of them yet). This was after several confused people asked for an > explanation from me as co-chair. > > I believe these statements were correct, and do not detract from the work > you put in. I just wanted the Math WG members present to understand that > many/most HTML WG members would not be able to help them interpret the > comments. > > If you have further concerns, let's take it offline or to www-archive. > > Regards, > Maciej > > On Nov 6, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Shelley Powers wrote: > >> There is no procedure in place when it comes to how we comment to >> other groups. I was operating under a deadline, which I needed to >> meet, because I have another task deadline, also for this group, also >> before November 11th. As it was, I also put the comments out for >> review, and modified the comments accordingly. >> >> I'm sorry that some members of this group were disappointed with the >> comments we developed for MathML, and that I went ahead and sent the >> comments to the Math WG. I would like to remind this group that no one >> was willing to step forward to do any comments before I and Joe >> volunteered. >> >> I am disappointed that one of the co-chairs of this group degenerated >> my effort to the Math WG at the TPAC meeting this week [1]. >> >> Shelley >> >> [1] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20091107#l-21 >> > >
Received on Saturday, 7 November 2009 01:42:22 UTC