- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:43:43 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
Henri Sivonen On 09-11-04 16.26: > On Nov 4, 2009, at 17:08, Julian Reschke wrote: > >>>>> What problem does this solve? >>>> It solves the same problem that head/@profile solves; >>> What's the point of introducing new syntax if it solves the same >>> problem as the old syntax? >> If HTML5 hadn't removed head/@profile we probably wouldn't have this >> discussion. > > The syntax isn't the reason why HTML5 rejects @profile. HTML5 rejects > the concept. Recasting the concept into superficially different syntax > doesn't really address the reason of rejection. Exactly. Ian hasn't lifted a finger to make rel=profile a valid keyword. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:44:17 UTC