- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:34:59 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Leif wrote: > ... > What do you mean by "scoping"? Is the fact that HTML 4 defines > that the first URI of the @profile attribute is the "significant" > one an example of scoping? > ... Maybe. I was thinking of cases where a profile only applies to part of a document, which could easily happen with syndication. > And in that regard: A complete switch to @rel=profile seems to me > to take away the feature that one of the profile URIs is the > "significant" one. A change to link/@rel=profile would need to define a similar thing then. > I would like to suggest that @profile is kept fully valid and that > it is said to contain the significant profile. The significant > profile may (re)define/require additional profiles (see below) as > part of its own profile. Thus, if you want to mark the document as > "my kind of html", then you should use @profile. I personally think it should be fully conforming, too (with the proposed errata). The current proposal is a compromise. > ... BR, Julian -- DSL-Preisknaller: DSL Komplettpakete von GMX schon für 16,99 Euro mtl.!* Hier klicken: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 15:35:36 UTC