- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:12:05 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On May 21, 2009, at 09:59, Larry Masinter wrote: > >> I also agree with Roy's assessment [1] that the document is named >> incorrectly and should not be released with the current name. > > > Titling it "HTML 5" is actually one of the relatively few resolutions > this group has adopted formally: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/0909.html > > 95 in favor (rolling concur into this number), 3 against, 4 abstaining. > Those voting against proposed instead: > 5.01 > Canonical HTML > (x)html5 > > It seems that the group consensus was overwhelmingly in favor of a title > like "HTML 5". > http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results#xname > > It seems counter-productive to reopen this WG decision. I was imprecise. Nobody is questioning the <h1>. What is in question is the <h2>. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 14:12:46 UTC