Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-05-21

On May 21, 2009, at 09:59, Larry Masinter wrote:

> I also agree with Roy's assessment [1] that the document is named
> incorrectly and should not be released with the current name.


Titling it "HTML 5" is actually one of the relatively few resolutions  
this group has adopted formally:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/0909.html

95 in favor (rolling concur into this number), 3 against, 4  
abstaining. Those voting against proposed instead:
5.01
Canonical HTML
(x)html5

It seems that the group consensus was overwhelmingly in favor of a  
title like "HTML 5".
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results#xname

It seems counter-productive to reopen this WG decision.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 08:47:15 UTC