- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:56:28 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli On 09-07-31 18.43: > Anne van Kesteren On 09-07-31 18.21: > >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:07:37 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >>> I see that you insist on "esoteric". Hence I suggest hat you >>> keep the examples - NET and PI - and instead of adding a link >>> to "esoteric", make a link from NET as well as from PI to >>> their respective descriptions in Appendix B of HTML 4. >> >> I dropped the shorthand markup example and instead pointed to >> HTML4 for both the features as HTML4 already includes examples. > > That is not as telling as it would have been to show examples one could > relate to - PHP and JavaScript - in the text. > > 1+ for adding the links. -1 for not having examples. I'm not asking for any poll on this anymore. Thanks, Anne. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 19:57:10 UTC