- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:06:09 +0200
- To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <lhs@malform.no>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:30:20 +0200, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> wrote: > Though I disagree with the design, but in order to reflect what the > draft actually says - and apparently has said all along, and thus to > ensure (better) review of this decision, I would like to ask Anne to add > to the differences document that HTML 4 Processing Statements count as > invalid markup in HTML 5. And thus that <?php ... ?> is invalid HTML > according to the HTML 5 draft. It says "HTML 5 defines an HTML syntax that is compatible with HTML 4 and XHTML 1 documents published on the Web, but is not compatible with the more esoteric SGML features of HTML 4, such as the NET syntax (i.e. <em/content/)." I think this is intended to include processing instructions, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to list more SGML features that are no longer supported. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 08:07:09 UTC