- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:30:20 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Sam Ruby On 09-07-24 13.45: > Laura Carlson wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >>>> As a first step in finding a solution to this issue, shall the HTML WG >>>> restore the summary attribute to HTML5? >>> HTML5 already allows the summary="" attribute >> >> Do you mean the editor's draft or the latest published draft? The >> editor's draft is always in a state of flux so a poll based on >> anything it that would be meaningless. > > Ian, Anne, Mike: it is time to meet our heartbeat requirements. Would > it be possible for each of you to do whatever magic it takes to produce > a new published draft (and accompanying HTML 5 differences document)? > > I'm quite willing to go with lazy consensus on this, so unless anybody > objects to us replacing the 23 April draft with a more recent version, > and does so by the time we complete our next call (possibly to be > scheduled for 30 July), then I will view that as a group decision to > publish. Though I disagree with the design, but in order to reflect what the draft actually says - and apparently has said all along, and thus to ensure (better) review of this decision, I would like to ask Anne to add to the differences document that HTML 4 Processing Statements count as invalid markup in HTML 5. And thus that <?php ... ?> is invalid HTML according to the HTML 5 draft. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 01:31:02 UTC