Re: Codecs for <video> and <audio> (survey of positions on ISSUE-7 video-codecs)

On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 13:38 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > I don't see anything wrong with it, other than that we'd
> > delete the "This is an ongoing issue..." sentence when
> > we close issue-7.
> David Singer (somewhat reluctantly) was willing to take ownership of 
> this issue[1], I was simply waiting to give anybody else a chance to 
> step forward.  In any case, I'm happy with Dave owning it, and am 
> confident that he too would be more than willing to step back if 
> somebody else wanted to champion it for a while.

I'll take that as "don't bother with a survey".

> - Sam Ruby
> [1]
Dan Connolly, W3C
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 18:55:11 UTC