W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2009

Re: ssh key (Was: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference (Was: Input on the agenda))

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:32:57 -0500
Message-ID: <643cc0270907031432x5cd60e77x12ae2aa071b1e60f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Rob Sayre<rsayre@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/09 9:46 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:
> I know there was good natured joshing on this in the WhatWG IRC, but
> did you get access to the actual HTML 5 document, or only the
> repository, where you can create a duplicate for editing an
> alternative?
> Hi Shelley,
> I'm not sure. I can cvs checkout all of the existing documents. I don't plan
> on finding out if I can edit the documents that are already there, since I
> don't want to overwrite the work of others. Everyone's work deserves
> respect.
> The chairs have repeatedly stated that anyone is welcome to produce a
> document. It's probably just the fact that there has been only one document
> up until now that makes people think they need access to Ian's document.
> What changes did you have in mind for the table section? The first edit I am
> planning is to make the summary attribute conforming, with a note explaining
> that it hasn't always worked very well, and may continue not to. Does that
> sound ok with you?
> - Rob

I thought with CVS, there wouldn't be the risk of losing the edits,
but I can see your point -- if there's no formal split of the document
across people, an edit war would probably begin.

It would be better to hear from the accessibility folks, but your
change sounds great to me. I think that Steve Faulkner was also going
to get access to the repository, for accessibility edits. Not sure

Doc procedures: So you duplicate the document, and make your changes.
Do you, then, need to link it within an email to this group so that
people can see the changes? What is the procedure followed to ensure
these documents are given their due consideration? Do we need to
formally submit them?


Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 21:33:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:50 UTC