- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:23:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Even if a better place can be found, why not follow your > > > > > previous policy of adding a section to HTML5 and moving it out > > > > > if/when a better venue is found? > > > > Because this isn't required for interop, and so it's not critical. > > > Required for interop? I'm confused. > > > > I mean that we don't have to have a spec to get browsers to all > > implement PNG or DOM2 Core. The whole point of the proposed spec would > > have been to document what interop exists, and what interop browser > > vendors predict the next generation will have, so such a spec by > > definition wouldn't be needed for interop. Thus, since we agree that > > on the long term it doesn't belong in HTML5, it doesn't make sense to > > add it to HTML5 just to remove it later. This is unlike other features > > that we added then removed later, which were added because there was > > an immediate need for a spec to obtain interop amongst interested > > implementors. > > You lost me again, and furthermore you are asserting an agreement on a > topic that I don't recall expressing an opinion on. > > The original topic was "required for interop". > > If the goal of HTML 5 is to document what interop exists at this point > in time in 2009, then HTML 5 would have no video tag at all; instead > HTML 5 would document how YouTube currently works. > > Until other things that are intended to be split out later are, in fact, > split out I don't see any point in discussing further what the final > form of the document will be. I don't understand what you are asking. I think we may be speaking at cross-purposes here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 3 July 2009 10:24:27 UTC