W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:11:43 -0800
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <D0DD00BC-9BF7-45EA-9565-EFCDEE96E816@apple.com>
To: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>

On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>> The current status for this issue:
>>
>> - We have a Working Group draft that uses dt/dd for the caption and  
>> body of
>> the figures and details elements.
>> - We have a Change Proposal to stop using dt/dd for this purpose  
>> and instead
>> use a new <fltcap> element:
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDt
>>
>> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current  
>> process
>> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who  
>> prefers
>> the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change  
>> Proposal), what
>> we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" as the  
>> Proposal
>> Details), but with similar level of detail in the other sections to  
>> what
>> Manu produced.
>>
>
> To what Manu produced? Or what I produced?

Sorry, cut and paste error! I meant to say "to what Shelley produced".

Regards,
Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 17:12:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:54 UTC