W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:02 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0270912091006s64682e0fm138ede1061980d29@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Shelley Powers wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The current status for this issue:
>>>
>>> - We have a Working Group draft that uses dt/dd for the caption and body
>>> of
>>> the figures and details elements.
>>> - We have a Change Proposal to stop using dt/dd for this purpose and
>>> instead
>>> use a new <fltcap> element:
>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDt
>>>
>>> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current process
>>> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who
>>> prefers
>>> the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change Proposal),
>>> what
>>> we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal
>>> Details), but with similar level of detail in the other sections to what
>>> Manu produced.
>>>
>>
>> To what Manu produced? Or what I produced?
>
> Sorry, cut and paste error! I meant to say "to what Shelley produced".
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>
>

Cool. I wasn't sure if there was still unaddressed concerns with the
proposal, or I needed to provide additional detail.

Shelley
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:06:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:54 UTC