W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ISSUE-83: dt-dd-semantics - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals

From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:01:24 -0600
Message-ID: <643cc0270912090901u7671c4fbi72c216affa3ea812@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> The current status for this issue:
> - We have a Working Group draft that uses dt/dd for the caption and body of
> the figures and details elements.
> - We have a Change Proposal to stop using dt/dd for this purpose and instead
> use a new <fltcap> element:
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/DdDt
> The current draft was produced before we instituted the current process
> requiring rationale in commit messages, so if there are anybody who prefers
> the draft as it is (or even wants to make a different Change Proposal), what
> we need is a Change Proposal (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal
> Details), but with similar level of detail in the other sections to what
> Manu produced.

To what Manu produced? Or what I produced?

> In addition, at this time the Chairs would also like to solicit alternate
> Change Proposals, in case anyone would like to advocate a different change
> than the specific one in the existing Change Proposal.
> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by January 16th,
> 2010, we proceed with a Call for Consensus on Shelley's Change Proposal.
> Regards,
> Maciej

Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 17:01:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:04 UTC