- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:21:41 +0000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Quoting Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/references.html#references > > ... or it would mean that HTML5's current organization is not ideal. > > Care to comment? Whilst I am not Tab, I can say that I find the current organization of the spec less easy to use than the previous unsplit document. On the other hand I accept that in some cases other considerations might be more important than how usable the spec is for me. In the specific case of microdata however many of the arguments presented for splitting the spec seem to boil down to it being "unfair" to have microdata in the main spec and RDFa outside it. I don't think arguments based on perceived fairness are valid technical arguments and as such I don't think they should be given much weight.
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 20:22:33 UTC