- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:59:54 -0500
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
James Graham wrote: > Quoting Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>: > >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/references.html#references >> >> ... or it would mean that HTML5's current organization is not ideal. >> >> Care to comment? > > Whilst I am not Tab, I can say that I find the current organization of > the spec less easy to use than the previous unsplit document. Do you have a concrete proposal to offer? > On the other hand I accept that in some cases other considerations might > be more important than how usable the spec is for me. In the specific > case of microdata however many of the arguments presented for splitting > the spec seem to boil down to it being "unfair" to have microdata in the > main spec and RDFa outside it. I don't think arguments based on > perceived fairness are valid technical arguments and as such I don't > think they should be given much weight. I don't see the word "unfair" in Manu's Change Proposal. - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 22:00:28 UTC