On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> Sam Ruby wrote: >>>> ... >>>> That should be simple. Is there anybody who is *opposed* to >>>> HTML5 describing all elements/attributes of previous specs? >>>> Ian indicated that he believes that it does. You have pointed >>>> out that it does not currently. If we treat these differences as >>>> bugs (and add a history section, as you and Anne discussed), is >>>> this issue resolved? >>> >>> Yes! >> Add definition of <meta scheme> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7412 >> > >> Add definition of <html profile> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7413 >> > >> Please add a history section <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7414 >> > >> I believe the editor intends to take action on all of these. Are >> any other bugs needed? > > Looks like <a name>: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1242.html Right now I'm not clear enough on what info Roy thinks should be added to file it as a bug, but I will gladly do so if we can clarify the desired change through further discussion. > > It also looks like we have Larry's concurrence (thanks Larry!): > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1222.html Yep, looks good. > In any case, I've already marked the issue as pending review. And > just so nobody can claim that they didn't have an opportunity to > comment, let's keep with the schedule of closing this one on > 2009-09-03, with the proviso that it can be reopened should any of > the above bugs be closed as WONTFIX or otherwise addressed in a way > that does not resolve this issue. Sounds right to me. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 06:54:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC