- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:58:01 -0700
- To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
This sounds good. I'd suggsted another option if there wasn't a resolution between (a) and (b) but this sounds like fixing up (a), which is fine. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:25 AM To: Sam Ruby Cc: public-html@w3.org WG; Larry Masinter Subject: Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03 Sam Ruby wrote: > ... > That should be simple. Is there anybody who is *opposed* to HTML5 > describing all elements/attributes of previous specs? > > Ian indicated that he believes that it does. You have pointed out that > it does not currently. If we treat these differences as bugs (and add a > history section, as you and Anne discussed), is this issue resolved? Yes! > ... BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 21:58:45 UTC