- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:11:30 -0400
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> Sam Ruby wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> That should be simple. Is there anybody who is *opposed* to HTML5 >>>>> describing all elements/attributes of previous specs? >>>>> Ian indicated that he believes that it does. You have pointed out >>>>> that it does not currently. If we treat these differences as bugs >>>>> (and add a history section, as you and Anne discussed), is this >>>>> issue resolved? >>>> >>>> Yes! >>> Add definition of <meta scheme> >>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7412> >>> Add definition of <html profile> >>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7413> >>> Please add a history section >>> <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7414> >>> I believe the editor intends to take action on all of these. Are any >>> other bugs needed? >> >> Looks like <a name>: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1242.html > > Right now I'm not clear enough on what info Roy thinks should be added > to file it as a bug, but I will gladly do so if we can clarify the > desired change through further discussion. http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7422 - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:12:12 UTC