Re: ISSUE-53: mediatypereg - suggest closing on 2009-09-03

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>> the current registration looses information from RFC 2854 -- RFC 
>>>> 2854 applies to all HTML vocabularies (and references them), while 
>>>> the HTML5 just describes the "current" language. (this could of 
>>>> course be fixed in HTML5 by adding that historic information in the 
>>>> right place)
>>> HTML5 obsoletes all prior vocabularies and defines behaviour (and 
>>> semantics) for all text/html documents. So it is appropriate for it to 
>>> do this.
>> We can choose to ignore old mark-up definitions only if HTML5 is one of 
>> many definitions for "text/html".  If HTML5 is claiming to define all of 
>> text/html, then all text/html elements and attributes must be defined 
>> within the specification (perhaps deprecated, but nevertheless fully 
>> defined).
> They are. If I missed any, please let me know.

I enumerated some just yesterday 
There are probably more.

(I am aware of 
but these are not definitions, but just an enumeration of things that 
are gone)

BR, Julian

Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:20:24 UTC