- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:19:38 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> the current registration looses information from RFC 2854 -- RFC >>>> 2854 applies to all HTML vocabularies (and references them), while >>>> the HTML5 just describes the "current" language. (this could of >>>> course be fixed in HTML5 by adding that historic information in the >>>> right place) >>> HTML5 obsoletes all prior vocabularies and defines behaviour (and >>> semantics) for all text/html documents. So it is appropriate for it to >>> do this. >> We can choose to ignore old mark-up definitions only if HTML5 is one of >> many definitions for "text/html". If HTML5 is claiming to define all of >> text/html, then all text/html elements and attributes must be defined >> within the specification (perhaps deprecated, but nevertheless fully >> defined). > > They are. If I missed any, please let me know. I enumerated some just yesterday (<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/1093.html>). There are probably more. (I am aware of <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#non-conforming-features>, but these are not definitions, but just an enumeration of things that are gone) BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 08:20:24 UTC