Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: >> the current registration looses information from RFC 2854 -- RFC 2854 >> applies to all HTML vocabularies (and references them), while the HTML5 >> just describes the "current" language. (this could of course be fixed in >> HTML5 by adding that historic information in the right place) > > HTML5 obsoletes all prior vocabularies and defines behaviour (and > semantics) for all text/html documents. So it is appropriate for it to > do this. If it would, yes. But it doesn't. text/html is also for documents authored in earlier versions of HTML, and HTML5 doesn't describe those completely (such as meta/@scheme, head/@profile etc) BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 21 August 2009 08:22:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC