On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Aug 21, 2009, at 12:29 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > > > > the current registration looses information from RFC 2854 -- RFC > > > 2854 applies to all HTML vocabularies (and references them), while > > > the HTML5 just describes the "current" language. (this could of > > > course be fixed in HTML5 by adding that historic information in the > > > right place) > > > > HTML5 obsoletes all prior vocabularies and defines behaviour (and > > semantics) for all text/html documents. So it is appropriate for it to > > do this. > > We can choose to ignore old mark-up definitions only if HTML5 is one of > many definitions for "text/html". If HTML5 is claiming to define all of > text/html, then all text/html elements and attributes must be defined > within the specification (perhaps deprecated, but nevertheless fully > defined). They are. If I missed any, please let me know. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 03:02:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:54 UTC