- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:38:49 -0400
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
- public-html-wg-announce, and many others + public-html Shelley Powers wrote: >> Topic: Issue-41/Action-97 decentralized-extensibility / Chris Wilson >> >> Recommendation: as this continues to not attract a tangible proposal, >> I'm inclined to demote this issue to raised. > > What does it mean to demote this to a raised issue from an open issue? > Does this mean, then, that we're no longer holding for an action from > Chris and new actions can be proposed? New actions can be proposed, and would be most welcome. I like the term that Maciej used recently w.r.t. "wishlist"[1], and will further suggest that people refer to the actual definitions of the various states[2]. The next step after open => raised, may very well be raised => closed if the issue does not attract a proposal. Chris Wilson wrote: > I'm sorry, I thought this issue had been updated already. There's > now an IE team member who is working on a proposal; for the time > being, I asked that the item be assigned to Adrian Bateman. I think > this was at the conference call 2 weeks ago; I think Dan was adding > Adrian to Tracker so I could reassign but it never got reassigned. I > just did so. > > (Sorry I can't look up the discussion; w3.org is currently rejecting > most page requests due to "abuse from your IP".) > > That said, of course, if someone wants to volunteer other actions to > move the issue forward, I don't think that's a bad idea. Changing the owner, in my opinion, that does not change the status. - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Aug/0635.html [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/#head-47c0b55d661dcf93f76d586ddbe292c9abc597e4
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:39:32 UTC