- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:31:25 -0400
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, 'HTML WG' <public-html@w3.org>
Murray Maloney wrote: > At 07:19 PM 8/3/2009 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >> I think in this case there is no consensus because a small group of >> people want to block consensus due to an emotional attachment to >> @summary, and therefore refuse to discuss the evidence presented to >> the group that it has completely failed in practice. I think a >> rational discussion of that evidence would lead to the conclusions >> that Ian has already reached. And I think the people involved don't >> care whether the standard fails, and therefore have no incentive to >> try to work with others towards reaching consensus. > > Na na na na na. Murray, please take these types of responses elsewhere. - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 11:32:24 UTC