At 07:19 PM 8/3/2009 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >I think in this case there is no consensus because a small group of >people want to block consensus due to an emotional attachment to >@summary, and therefore refuse to discuss the evidence presented to >the group that it has completely failed in practice. I think a >rational discussion of that evidence would lead to the conclusions >that Ian has already reached. And I think the people involved don't >care whether the standard fails, and therefore have no incentive to >try to work with others towards reaching consensus. Na na na na na.Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 11:10:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:53 UTC